UT2003 Testing

}TCP{ZzCaT · Post by **}TCP{ZzCaT** » Sun Dec 07, 2003 10:10 am

Van wrote: I got all the downloading out of the way and went into the UT2003 server and it was pretty good for me. Ping was 142 most of the time.
The version update (i guess it was the version update) made a big difference in my graphics.....things are bright and clear.

That would be the 'brightskins' patch I applied.

ZZ

Post by **}TCP{Wolf** » Mon Dec 08, 2003 12:16 am

I thought the brightskins patch was a purely client side mod? Please clarify and enlighten me

}TCP{ZzCaT · Post by **}TCP{ZzCaT** » Mon Dec 08, 2003 8:27 pm

}TCP{Wolf wrote:I thought the brightskins patch was a purely client side mod? Please clarify and enlighten me

If Van downloaded and installed the bright skins things would seem brighter for her, what's to clarify??

ZZ

Post by **}TCP{Wolf** » Mon Dec 08, 2003 10:20 pm

Because according to what I read on an Epic page, the brightskin patch is NOT SUPPORTED by Epic. Your description is in direct contradiction to its design.

If you made it work as if it was a ServerPackage, then you did something it was not designed for - at least to my last information. So if you have any updates on it, that's to clarify!

}TCP{ZzCaT · Post by **}TCP{ZzCaT** » Wed Dec 10, 2003 11:43 am

Ermm.... well I didn't install anything out of the ordinary for the server. Guess it's a client only patch.

Personally I haven't noticed much of a difference between normal and bright skins but that may also have been caused by my video settings.

ZZ

www.tcpclan.net

Welcome to the Board

UT2003 Testing