}TCP{Sinfonia or FranksSinfonia

[}TCP{Snowbird]

OK! The subject say it all. There was a debate abot the names of maps that we, the TCP mappers make. I have no trouble calling my maps a name with the TCP logo in front. The only problem I have is with the remade maps. Is it "right" to use the TCP logo in front of the name?

[}TCP{Carnage]

I don't see why not

After all it U lot who remade it

It would be a different story if the maps where from 2003 / or 2004 because the map makers could still be around

As for the U1 map makers i think they would be pleased to see their map in the newer versions

[}TCP{Coco]

Hi!

Funny, Carnage, this is quite similar to what I wrote about Franks concerns in the other thread already.

Frank, in my opinion, you could also call the map }TCP{FranksSinfonia if you like.

Coco.

[}TCP{Cloud]

Name is ok, leave it like that.

[}TCP{Snowbird]

Thanks for the quick reply. Coco, you have hit it on the head. Why not name it like you said. Combine the both. OK! I will let the poll run for a few days, and as long as the rest of us are not against it, it will be renamed }TCP{FranksSinfonia

Carnage, I guess you are riight. I would also be pleased if I had seen someone remake my map, but yo never know about some people. I do not want to put a bad light on the clan....

Ches,, I liked it also. I guess that is why I choose it. It has a good ring to it.

[}TCP{Ramses]

I think you might be on dodgy ground naming converted maps }TCP{, especially if they are identical to the original ?

[}TCP{Snowbird]

OK, the polls have it. I am ready to submit the level, and will call it }TCP{.Franks-Sinfonia[2K4].

[Kobra]

}TCP{.Franks-Sinfonia[2K4]July-15:40_edition :p

[}TCP{Coco]

Hi!

OK, the polls have it. I am ready to submit the level, and will call it }TCP{.Franks-Sinfonia[2K4].

Nice, I'm anxious to see it!

But why the dot in front of "Franks"?

Coco.

[}TCP{Snowbird]

Just there to make the people wonder.